What is the legal term for evidence that cannot be used in court due to how it was obtained?

The correct answer is "inadmissible evidence." This term refers to evidence that is not permitted to be presented in court. The primary reasons for evidence being deemed inadmissible are often related to the manner in which it was obtained, such as violating a defendant's constitutional rights or not adhering to proper legal procedures. For instance, if evidence is derived from an illegal search and seizure, it would be classified as inadmissible.

Inadmissible evidence cannot be considered by the judge or jury, which is fundamental to ensuring a fair trial. The legal standards governing the admissibility of evidence are crucial to maintaining the integrity of the judicial system.

The other terms do not appropriately describe this concept. "Admissible evidence" refers to information that can be lawfully used in court. "Illegitimate evidence" is not a standard legal term used to describe this form of evidence, and "excludable evidence" is less commonly referred to in this context, even though it may convey a similar idea. Understanding the distinctions between these terms is essential for anyone studying criminal justice, as it underlines the importance of legal procedures in the gathering and presentation of evidence.