Which element is NOT one of the four basic elements of every crime?

The concept of concurrence refers to the requirement that the intent to commit a crime (mens rea) must coincide with the act of committing that crime (actus reus). Within the structure of criminal law, there are four essential elements that characterize the commission of a crime: mens rea (the mental state or intent), actus reus (the physical act), causation (the link between the act and the result), and the absence of any legal justification or excuse.

While concurrence is indeed a vital principle in understanding how these elements work together, it is often viewed as an underlying principle rather than a standalone element. The other three—mens rea, actus reus, and causation—are specifically recognized as the core components necessary for establishing that a crime has been committed.

In summary, while concurrence is important in demonstrating how intent and action interact, it is not categorized as one of the four basic elements of a crime itself. Instead, it functions as a principle that helps to explain the relationship between the required mental state and the physical act within the framework of criminal liability.