Which type of evidence is classified as "circumstantial"?

Circumstantial evidence refers to evidence that implies a fact or event but does not directly prove it. This type of evidence requires an inference to connect it to a conclusion about a particular fact or event. For example, if a person is seen near a crime scene at the time a crime was committed, this might suggest their involvement, yet it does not constitute direct proof that they committed the crime.

In contrast, witness testimony that directly links a suspect to a crime consists of direct evidence, as it provides explicit information about the suspect's actions. A confession made by the accused is also a form of direct evidence, as it involves the suspect admitting to the crime. Physical evidence collected at the crime scene, such as fingerprints or weapons, provides concrete proof that can be directly associated with the crime or the suspect. Hence, while other types of evidence have their own strengths in a legal context, it is circumstantial evidence that operates through implications rather than direct connections.